Home for your Pet

Madras High Court docket Phone calls For Suggestions To Deal with Issues Relating To Stray Animals, Animals

The Madras Substantial Courtroom has enlarged the scope of a community fascination litigation pertaining to menace of stray puppies inside IIT Madras and has named for solutions from several stakeholders for addressing the concerns connected to menace created by stray animals and pets in community destinations.

The bench of Acting Main Justice Munishwar Nath Bhandari and Justice P.D Audikesavalu urged the condition government and Corporation to get inspiration from foreign countries that have guidelines for regulating steps of pet proprietors.

The court docket has questioned Senior Counsel Satish Parasaran to get direct in the subject, aid the court docket and consolidate wholly codified recommendations from all stakeholders such as other counsels in the situation, NGOs, animal legal rights defenders and many others. The court expressed hope that the state of Tamil Nadu will be the pioneer in framing procedures for the remedy of pet animals in the place.

“We should just take this litigation more for the betterment of stray pet dogs and pet animals as properly”, the court docket mentioned.

Further, in pursuance of its former order, the Increased Chennai Municipal Company (GCC) educated the bench that the 22 canines remaining in IIT-Madras Enclosures were rescued, medically diagnosed and handed above to Non-Governmental Organisations.

When taking be aware of the progress created by GCC in using accountability for the pet dogs within the enclosure, the Court docket has made the decision to expand the scope of the PIL by the inclusion of tips for monitoring and managing pet animals in just the ambit of instructions that the courtroom will difficulty.

On the previous event, the courtroom had expressed its inclination to consolidate thorough recommendations about the professional medical therapy, immunization, sterilization, relocation etcetera of stray dogs applicable across the point out of Tamil Nadu, beginning with Chennai. The courtroom meant to formulate those pointers by inviting proposals from all lawyers.

Now, the counsel showing for Greater Chennai Corporation, Advocate Karthika Ashok, submitted that there ended up some problems in releasing pet dogs from the enclosure in ideal parts with no objections from the residents, and for that reason, they were handed more than to NGOs for the time being.

The court then remarked that the future issue to be dealt with would be ascertaining the motive at the rear of IIT-Madras not approaching Bigger Chennai Corporation about the stray dogs in the Campus. Later on, the courtroom will have to look at if the allegations about the weak treatment of puppies in the campus enclosures were legitimate or not.

At this juncture, Advocate Chitra Sampath, appearing for IIT-Madras argued that there ended up numerous inspections performed in the previous 3 months and none of individuals inspections made an allegation versus IIT-Madras about the cure of stray pet dogs in enclosures.

“You should have educated Higher Chennai Corporation. You didn’t have the authority to hold them in enclosures. Their issue in the enclosures is yet another element that will be looked into afterwards”, the bench orally remarked.

The counsel for IIT then iterated that feral canines were being taken care of by IIT since they were being posing a threat to the wildlife inside of the campus such as blackbucks. In accordance to the counsel, there was a long-lasting committee comprising of Company officials and wildlife officers offering ideas as to how the feral pet dogs ought to be dealt with. IIT-M placed them in puppy enclosures immediately after having all those suggestions into account, she extra.

As for each the IIT-M counsel’s request, the court docket posted the subject for 9th February, affording her plenty of time to compile all the affidavits and other paperwork for the convemience of the court.


On 9th December, Madras Substantial Court experienced appear down intensely on the lukewarm approach of Higher Chennai Corporation in working with stray dogs.

“This is a full failure of the Municipal Company. However, this is not a dilemma of Chennai by yourself. We want to carry on with this litigation in this kind of a way that compiled suggestions from proposals built by stakeholders can be put to use for the treatment method of stray dogs (health care treatment, immunization, sterilization, relocation and many others.). We invite solutions from all attorneys on how the canines ought to be taken care of inside of the framework of Policies (Animal Birth Command (Pet dogs) Procedures, 2001). Ideas can be consolidated from all quarters. Later on, we can go an ideal order concerning the very same. We imagine that the order of this court will have some sanctity”, the court docket orally remarked right before supplying instructions to GCC.

The distinct path provided to Greater Chennai Corporation was to launch the 22 pet dogs remaining in IIT-Madras Enclosures and hand them in excess of to the Chennai Municipal Company.

On 7th October the court docket had noted the contradictory stands taken by the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) and Animal Husbandry Section of Tamil Nadu. The Extra Governing administration Pleader had then mentioned that 57 puppies had died lately as per their inspection report while Advocate S.R Sundaram showing up for the Animal Welfare Board submitted that IIT-Madras hasn’t committed any infringements or violations as for every their report.

The court was also crucial about other NGOs and animal activists impleading in the latest general public interest litigation the place the petitioner has sufficiently espoused for the trigger of canine worried.

“We would not acquire publicity impleadments in PILs for the similar induce”, the court docket had noted then.

Before that, on 17th September, the petitioner had pointed out that 49 puppies have died till then and experienced referred to a single of the suggestions next the Joint Committee’s( comprising of customers from the Point out Animal Husbandry Office, Animal Welfare Board and Municipal Company) Inspection Report, which recommended that submit-mortems of useless pet dogs should really be carried out.

Back again then, IIT Madras authorities submitted just before the Court docket that each canine on its campus is micro-chipped and 3 separate enclosures have been provided considering that some of the dogs are aggressive and impede movement in just the campus and occasionally have a tendency to threaten pupils.

Situation Title: People For Cattle In India v. The Chairman & Another

Case No: WP/2287/2021 (PIL)